
Organizers:
Patrick Fowler, University of Exeter, P.W.Fowler@exeter.ac.uk
Pierre Hansen, GERAD - Ecole des Hautes
Etudes Commerciales, pierreh@crt.umontreal.ca
8:30 - 9:00 Breakfast and Registration9:00 - 9:15 Welcome and Greeting: Fred S. Roberts, DIMACS Director9:15 - 9:30 Introductory Remarks: Pierre Hansen, GERAD9:30 - 10:10 Link Jonathan Berry, Elon College10:15 - 10:45 Break
10:45 - 11:25 Designing Learning Algorithms for Practical Computing
Mark Goldberg, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute11:30 - 1:30 Lunch and Informal Discussion1:30 - 2:25 Interactive Conjecturing I - The Vega System Interactive Conjecturing II - Lab demo of Vega Tomasz Pisanski, University of Ljubljiana2:30 - 3:00 Break3:00 - 3:40 Overview of Graph Dragan Stevanovic, University of Nis, Yugoslavia3:45 - 4:25 Lab demo of Link Jonathan Berry, Elon College4:30 - 5:10 CaGe - an environment for the work with some classes of planar graphs Sebastian Lisken, University of Bielefeld5:15 - 5:55 SEAL: System for enhancing algorithms through learning
Eric Breimer and Darren Lim, Rensselaer Polytechnic University
8:30 - 9:00 Breakfast9:00 - 9:40 Overview of Graffiti Siemion Fajtlowicz, University of Houston9:45 - 10:25 Application of Graffiti Ermilinda DeLaVina, University of Houston-Downtown10:30 - 11:00 Break
11:00 - 11:40 Overview of AGX
Pierre Hansen, GERAD
11:45 - 12:25 Application of AGX
Gilles Caporossi, Universite de Montreal12:30 - 2:00 Lunch and Informal Discussion2:00 - 2:40 Applications of AGX Hadrien Melot, University of Brussels2:45 - 3:15 Break3:15 - 3:55 Lab demo of Graffiti Ermilinda DeLaVina, University of Houston-Downtown4:00 - 4:40 Lab demo of AGX Gilles Caporossi, Universite de Montreal4:45 - 5:25 Applications of GraffitiBarbara Chervenka, University of Houston-Downtown and
Ryan Pepper, University of Houston6:30 - 9:00 Buffet Dinner at Holiday Inn, South Plainfield, Followed by a Social Hour
8:30 - 9:00 Breakfast9:00 - 9:40 On Progress in Automated Conjecture-Making
Craig Larson, University of Houston9:45 - 10:25 McKays canonical construction path method. An example: Posets Gunnar Brinkmann, University of Bielefeld10:30 - 11:00 Break
11:00 - 11:40 Research in machine learning
Susan Epstein, Hunter College11:45 - 12:25 Techniques for searching for maximum independent sets
Wendy Myrvold, University of Victoria12:30 - 1:30 Lunch1:30 - 2:25 Some applications of graph theory in chemistry, or What do chemists want from mathematicians, andwhat can they give in return?
Patrick Fowler, Exeter University2:30 - 3:00 Break3:00 - 3:40 Lab demo of Graph Dragan Stevanovic, University of Nis, Yugoslavia3:45 - 4:25 Polyhedral properties and duals of benzenoid indices
Hernan Abeledo, George Washington University4:30 - 5:00 Bounds on the stability number of a graphGabriela Alexe, Rutcor, Rutgers University
5:00 - 5:20 Time for interaction; software made available
8:30 - 9:00 Breakfast9:00 - 9:40 Representation of Chemical Graphs, Maps and Polyhedra
Tomasz Pisanski, University of Ljubljiana9:45 - 10:25 Construction of combinatorial structures, a theoretical approach
Reinhard Laue, University of Bayreuth10:30 - 11:00 Break
11:00 - 11:40 Computer generated conjectures in mathematical chemistry
Siemion Fajtlowicz, University of Houston11:45 - 12:25 Chemical Evolution
Robert Nachbar, Merck Research Laboratories
12:30 - 2:00 Lunch and Informal Discussion2:00 - 2:40 CAR: Computer-Aided Research of Integral Graphs
Dragan Stevanovic, University of Nis, Yugoslavia2:45 - 3:30 Time for interaction; software made available3:30 - 4:00 Break4:00 - 4:40 Encoding fullerenes and geodesic domes
Jack Graver, Syracuse University4:40 - 5:30 Panel discussion on ideas generated by the working group
8:30 - 9:00 Breakfast9:00 - 9:40 Puzzles, Graphs and Graph Generators
Dennis Shasha, New York University9:45 - 10:25 Constraint graph generation for mathematical chemistry
Reinhard Laue, University of Bayreuth10:30 - 11:00 Break
11:00 - 11:40 An Application Framework for Combinatorial Algorithms
Sandra Kingan, Pennsylvania State University11:45 - 12:25 Minimum Total Distance d-trees
Maolin Zheng, Frictionless 12:30 - 2:00 Lunch
2:00 - Conference ends, people can stay for informal discussion.
Points that arose at the discussion session Thursday, November 15th, 2001.
(Notes taken by Patrick Fowler)
For the next meeting (Montreal, 2003 or 2004):
It would be a good idea to have a specific Conjectures session / Open problems early in meeting, and then a follow-up session later in the meeting when participants have tried their approaches out on these problems. More open scheduling of the timetable to leave even more time for interaction would be appreciated by most of the participants.
Action:
Conjectures,
etc to be invited via the web page.
List of
interesting problems (text to be supplied by working group members) to be
published up on the page.
Contact
can be made via the web page and the e-mail list maintained at DIMACS
Interesting
links, e.g. to Written on the Wall and Graffiti, to be published on the web
page GRAPH to be added on the page.
Links or
copies of interesting papers of group members to be added to the page.
The main topic of the discussion was how to consolidate the efforts of all the groups who have made major investments in software and establishing a variety of widely different theoretical approaches, all with demonstrated success in particular domains.
The short-term need is for a common format for data exchange. After a lot of discussion of this point, it was suggested that a minimum first step is publication of the actual formats used by the existing programs VEGA, AGX, MOLGEN, CaGe, etc.
Action:
Program designers in the working group please supply details for the web page.
Kingan suggested JAVA programs linked to a graph server, and noted existence of XLMScheme. Myrvold suggested an agreement on language and platform; Brinkmann preferred a solution by modularity of programs and a common communication format; Pisanski wanted at least a common viewer for all the objects that would work in all the formats. Nachbar suggested that discussion be widened to infinite graphs and suggested that detailed consideration be given to whether the final formats would reflect a hierarchy of concepts (defined on what principle?) or would simply be defined separately for graphs, digraphs, multigraphs, etc. Lisken, Caporossi and others noted that piping was a powerful tool, though others added cautions about its usefulness in their own contexts, and Laue noted that there is a very different requirement in both format and handling when one is considering massive data transfer for large-scale computation rather than detailed work on a small number of objects.
Another point of discussion was a reminder that the workshop has also already produced very lively interchange of ideas and stimulated a number of pair-wise interactions which should lead to fruitful collaboration and eventual publication of results. It is already clear therefore that the workshop is likely to show a medium-term as well as a long-term benefits to workers in the field.
Action:
News about the various collaborations, lists of papers from the different groups and amplifications of discussion could all be to the working group email list, or placed centrally on the page. Significant updates to the web page will be notified to the mailing list by Sorin Alexe (salexe@dimacs.rutgers.edu) who is maintaining the page for us.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0100921